So I know many of us have seen in the movies that the first sign of a woman in labor is her "water" will break. In reality, it happens less than 15% of the time. So that means that you are more likely to have your water break sometime during early or active labor. Now the question begs, "Should the "water" be artificially broken by your provide?"
My opinion is no, if there is not medical reason for it (i.e. if the baby is already in fetal distress). The risk of an amniotomy far out weight any benefits, according to studies. The main reason practitioners perform this procedure is to "speed things up" but in reality this is not guaranteed and if it does, not significantly.
On the other hand the risk include:
- Increased chance of cord prolapse. When the cord drops down below the baby and is squeezed between babies head and cervix.
- Increased chance of cord compression. When the cord is squeezed by the babies body with the uterus.
- Increase chance of infection.
- Increased risk of Cesarean section.
- Increased risk of fetal distressed. Caused by the cushion around the baby being gone therefore the baby takes a much harder hit during contractions.
- If the baby is not already in the "right" position, lack of fluid prohibits proper placement.
Obviously these risk can happen whether or not the rupture of the membrane is artificial or spontaneous but more likely when you have a spontaneous rupture it is happening at the appropriate time for your body and baby, not when your practitioner says is a good time.
No comments:
Post a Comment